Chemicals in our food supply - Innocent until proven guilty?

>> Oct 26, 2010


Innocent until proven guilty is a great system for the law courts. Unfortunately, the "benefit of the doubt" is also given to the chemicals found in our food supply. With the recent announcement that BPA, a chemical banned by Canada in 2008 after it was found to pose serious risks to health, is now labelled "toxic", this was proven once again. What kept BPA off the list of toxic chemicals this long? In short: lobbyists, and the benefit of the doubt. In spite of the mounting evidence that BPA may pose risk to the general public and the environment, not just to formula fed infants from baby bottles, it remained protected, to a degree. The Government of Canada finally determined the evidence in support of BPA's safety wasn't strong enough.

Although the jig is up for BPA, there are still a multitude of other chemicals commonly found in our food supply with suspected associated health risks, including food dyes: erythrosine (banned in topical products in the US 20 years ago) and amaranth (banned in the US 30+ years ago).

Is it true that all chemicals are harmful to us? No. Just as it's not true that all natural items are safe. However, many of these chemicals are introduced into our food supply, skin care lines and household items without sufficient long-term research to say they are safe (see David Suzuki's Dirty Dozen).

Many of the pesticides still used in North American have been banned in Europe. Why is this? Are our scientists and government ahead or behind the EU? Is the EU being too cautious and removing them without research to say they’re harmful? When it comes to chemicals and our health, is there is such a thing as being too cautious? Obviously, enough concerns were raised overseas for their law makers to deem it important to completely remove these chemicals. Yet, they are still being sprayed here in Canada.

Pesticides can be carcinogens and neurotoxins, and threaten the health of humans and our environment. The argument in favour of these chemicals is that 1) they serve a useful purpose, and 2) such low levels will not affect us. They are “tolerable” levels. This is true for some, but nay-sayers argue that very little research has actually been done, especially in children. We are seeing the results of this with the BPA issue... widely found in products for years before enough scientific evidence came to light to cause the government to back track. Is it unreasonable to ask for chemicals to be kept OUT of our products until there is no question as to their safety? When it comes to chemicals in beauty products and pesticides, it should be guilty until proven innocent.

Sweden was the first country in the world to impose a tax on pesticides. By doing this, the country made is easier and cheaper for people to farm and purchase organically grown foods, and reduced pesticide use by up to 50%

What can you do about it? 

-Avoid packaged and processed foods. The more processed a food when you buy it, the higher likelihood someone has added unwanted additives and chemicals to it. If you must have junk foods, at least make them at home yourself, where you know exactly what goes in.

-Use the Environmental Working Groups' Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen list to help you decide which foods to purchase organically, and when to save your money.

-Washing fruits and veggies won't do the trick. Peel skins from fruits and vegetables that are conventionally grown, whenever possible.

-For non-food products, look for products with third-party verification that they're good for the earth, such as EcoLogo. If they're good for the earth, that means less chemicals, and that's good for you too.

Read more... Share

Is Today's "Organic" Sustainable?

>> Oct 11, 2010


What comes to mind when you hear the word “organic”?  Healthy? Environmentally friendly? Sustainable? Clean? Humane? Better tasting?  Sometimes organic is all of those things, but it's also important to know that often times, it is none.

There is a difference between organic the movement, and organic the industry as it stands today. Most of us, when we think about what organic means, conjure up ideas of happy animals running free in pasture, with no hormones or anti-biotics; animals that are fed organic feed that they would eat in nature. Or we think of "natural" foods that are grown without the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, that are as good for the earth as they are for us. These are the ideas that the early pioneers of organic had in mind. If you look up the antonyms to "organic", you’ll find words like “man-made” and “unnatural”. Unfortunately, organic looks very different today.


Organics today

If you visit an organic farm today, you may be surprised at what you find. Many of them don't look much different from a regular factory farm. Animals are raised in close quarters with "access to pasture" but that never really step foot outside. Many of the animals that turn into our organic meat supply are not raised much more humanely than your typical factory farm. These farms are essentially just "organic factory farms". That should be an oxymoron. Aside from meat, organic foods may be processed and packaged, high in sugar, fat salt, and additives, much like all the other conventional packaged foods on the grocery store shelves.

How did we get from that idealistic picture I described earlier, to this industry that looks so similar to everything else? When the public started demanding and purchasing more and more organic items, big food companies (I won't name names, but nearly all major big food companies are involved) saw an incredible financial opportunity that organics offered, and were determined to get their over sized slice of the pie. As more and more organic foods were showing up on the shelves, the government realized they must regulate this term - develop a series of standards and criteria in order to be able to use the term "organic".

From low fat to low carb, Big Food doesn’t let a good food trend pass them by. The problem came when Big Food companies, who don’t care about the organic "philosophy", lobby the government about what the criteria and standards should be. Big Food wants to be able to benefit from being able to use the term "organic" and increase sales, so the looser the organic regulations were, the faster, cheaper and easier they could slap the term "organic" on their packages and start to cash in on the trend. Today there is a list of "approved" additives and preservatives that can be used in organic foods, allowing for many "organic" items that really resemble foods that are more “man-made” and “unnatural” than what we think of as being organic.

Today, there is no shortage of organic junk foods. These foods, although marginally better for the environment in terms of how their ingredients are produced, are just as bad for our personal health. "Organic cane sugar" is still sugar, and too much of it can lead to weight gain, high levels of fats in your blood, and other health issues. Yet, studies have shown that people eat more of an item if the term "organic" is on the label. People are being led to believe they are consuming a healthier product than it actually is, and that is what I can "health washing".


Unsustainable Organics

The way organics are produced today, they are only marginally better, environmentally speaking, than their conventional counterparts. One thing I think is important to make clear is that organic does NOT mean sustainable. Organic foods are flown in from all corners of the globe: lettuce from California, Mangoes from Hawaii, and apples from Chile. This is an unsustainable practice. So which is better, an organically grown apple shipped all the way from Chile? Or a conventionally grown apple that came from a few kilometres away?

As I mentioned earlier, many of these organic farming operations resemble conventional farms more than they do a small, family run farm, as we might imagine. Your organic lettuce from California is mass produced. Producing food on this scale with a lack of diversification, organic or not, depletes the soil. The depleted soil means that more nitrogen (although “natural” sources such as manure and compost) must be added than if the soil were properly maintained, releasing more nitrogen into the air. This is what's called a "heavy input system" (compost and manure), and these inputs must be trucked from elsewhere. Smaller farming operations that practice crop rotation can subside on the materials that come from the same farm, and therefore, are less energy intensive.

The term organic alone does NOT imply:
  • There is zero negative impact on the environment
  • Animals are raised ethically
  • The food is any healthier for you
  • The food was produced locally
  • The workers are treated ethically
  • A small farmer is involved
  • Big food industries are not involved
Organic does not entail the ideal it once did. It’s not organic that is the answer we’ve been looking for, it’s everything organic stood for when the movement began. Organic today is not as it once was, and so, as with everything else, we must still do our due diligence when at the grocery store. Seeing organic does not mean  you don’t still need to read the label. If it’s packaged, it’s usually processed, and the less processed foods the better.


Beyond organic

Although it may seem like it, I’m not bashing organic. In fact, quite the opposite. The philosophy of organic I whole-heartily believe in. Unfortunately, that term no longer holds true to it's original meaning. While organic may well be on its way to being played out, the underlying organic philosophy is not.

In the end its about a demand for sustainable practices, because we can not be healthy people living on an unhealthy planet. It's time that we look beyond organic and source foods that are both organic and sustainable. To be truly sustainable, our food needs to travel fewer kilometers, not be covered with petroleum-based pesticides and fertilizers, be farmed using practices that leave the soil nutritionally-rich, be grown with a concern for those who produce the food and work on the farms, and foster a respect for the earth and animals that create and use that food.



Read more... Share
Related Posts with Thumbnails

  © Blogger template Simple n' Sweet by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP